Sir Meliagaunce
Le Morte d'ArthurSir Meliagaunce, son of King Bagdemagus, is presented in a short episode that turns a declaration of love for Queen Guenever into a public quarrel over which queen is fairest. His contest with Sir Lamorak is not simply a tournament of praise: it tests whether devotion to one’s chosen lady warrants anger at another knight’s different allegiance, and whether a fellow knight should answer such a disagreement with force. The intervention of Sir Launcelot brings the dispute to a close before its cause can become a lasting breach among King Arthur’s knights.
Identity and Introduction
Sir Meliagaunce is identified as King Bagdemagus’s son. He enters the episode while Sir Lamorak is resting at a chapel after the two have parted from Sir Tristram. Unnoticed by Lamorak, Meliagaunce arrives and turns his horse out to pasture. There, he makes a lament about his love for Queen Guenever. The narrative thus introduces him through an avowal of affection, overheard by another knight, before showing how that private declaration becomes the occasion for a public challenge.
Lamorak later meets two knights waiting in concealment for Sir Launcelot, whom they intend to attack because he killed their brother. He condemns their ambush as cowardly and defends Launcelot’s standing as a proven knight. When Lamorak subsequently encounters Meliagaunce, he directly connects the meeting to what he heard at the chapel: he asks why Meliagaunce loves Guenever as he does, making clear that the earlier lament has become the starting point for their exchange.
The Dispute with Sir Lamorak
Meliagaunce answers without disavowing his praise of Guenever. He says he loves her and will stand by that claim. Lamorak counters by praising Queen Morgause of Orkney, whom he considers the fairest queen and lady. Meliagaunce rejects this judgment, and the two part in anger after agreeing to prove their competing claims by combat.
Their fight begins with a mounted charge and continues on foot with swords. Meliagaunce is described as strong and capable, but Lamorak has the advantage and repeatedly forces him back; both nevertheless sustain wounds. The episode treats this as a real contest between fellow knights, while its declared cause remains a comparison of beauty. The emotional allegiance behind each man’s judgment gives the argument its force: Meliagaunce champions the queen he loves, while Lamorak explains that each knight sees his own lady as fairest.
Sir Launcelot’s Intervention
Sir Launcelot and Sir Bleoberis encounter the two men fighting. Launcelot rides between them and asks why they are battling when both are knights of King Arthur. Meliagaunce explains that he praised Guenever as the world’s fairest, while Lamorak named Morgause as more beautiful. Launcelot then rebukes Lamorak for disparaging the queen to whom he and the other knights owe allegiance, and offers to prove Guenever’s superiority in beauty and bounty.
Lamorak resists turning a difference of judgment into a quarrel with Launcelot. He says that every man thinks his own lady fairest and that praise offered from personal devotion should not provoke anger. He also tells Launcelot that, apart from Sir Tristram, Launcelot is the man with whom he is most reluctant to fight. Sir Bleoberis reinforces this appeal to perspective: he, too, considers his own lady the fairest, but does not take Launcelot’s contrary opinion as cause for anger. He reminds Launcelot that Lamorak is a noble knight who has consistently wished them well.
Launcelot accepts the correction and asks Lamorak to forgive his ill will, promising to amend his mistake. Lamorak readily accepts the apology, and Launcelot and Bleoberis depart. The confrontation does not establish which queen is objectively fairest; instead, it exposes the personal basis of the claims and restores the friendship threatened by treating praise as an insult.
Aftermath and Narrative Role
Once Meliagaunce and Lamorak have taken their horses, they part from one another. The episode provides no further account here of Meliagaunce’s response or of any lasting consequence between the two. Its resolution lies chiefly in Launcelot’s change of course: a challenge made in defense of Guenever gives way to an apology when Lamorak’s argument and Bleoberis’s example show that knights may honor different ladies without being enemies.
Meliagaunce’s role is therefore concentrated but structurally important. His declaration supplies the occasion for a dispute that moves from private lament to armed conflict, then into a wider conversation about loyalty, courtesy, and the limits of knightly anger. The episode’s resolution depends not on a victory in the beauty contest but on recognizing that each knight’s praise expresses his own devotion. Sir Lamorak and Meliagaunce separate, while Sir Launcelot’s acknowledgment of error prevents the quarrel from dividing fellow members of King Arthur’s court.


